Our firm was founded by the chair and co-chair of the litigation department of one of the largest IP boutiques in the country. Our lawyers have represented clients in more than 400 patent, trademark, trade secret, and copyright cases in courts around the nation. We’ve handled big cases and small cases, bet-the-company cases, and enforcement campaigns. We regularly represent plaintiffs and defendants before trial courts, appellate courts, the Trademark Trials and Appeals Board, the Patent Trials and Appeals Board, and in arbitrations.
Our experience means we’re not doing things for the first time. We’ve litigated the type of case and the specific legal issue, probably dozens of times. We’ve already been before the court and argued to the judge. We already know the technology and the industry.
Because we’ve seen it before, we don’t have to get up to speed on the legal or the technical issues. We dive in immediately, develop the strategy immediately, and begin driving the case forward immediately, whether to trial, summary judgment, or settlement.
Our experience isn’t confined to our partners. Even our associates have at least four years of IP litigation experience.
The wealth of experience doesn’t only make us effective; it also makes us efficient. Since we don’t need to get up to speed, our clients don’t need to pay us to get up to speed.
Our firm’s structure makes us even more efficient. Our partners have no incentive to keep their clients to themselves. We bring the work to the lawyer with the most relevant experience. And because our partners aren’t rewarded for the hours billed to their clients, and our lawyers aren’t rewarded for the hours they personally bill, there’s no incentive for anyone to bill even one more minute to a case than what’s necessary.
Well-Known Clients
Our lawyers have represented name-brand clients including, 5.11, Inc., Amazon.com, Best Buy, Broadcom Corporation, CVS, Game Show Network, In-n-Out Burgers, ITT, Knoll, Inc., Luxottica, Makita, Masimo Corporation, Mexicana Airlines, Microsemi, Monster Energy, Oakley, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Razor USA, Specialized Bicycle Components, Tesla, Toshiba, and Wal-Mart Stores.
Exceptional Results
The experience of our lawyers has resulted in exceptional results for our clients, including:
- Patent. In a jury trial, obtained a more than $100 million verdict for infringement of patents relating to a medical diagnostic device.
- Patent. In a jury trial, obtained a more than $40 million verdict for infringement of patents relating to a medical device, then obtained affirmance of that judgment on appeal to the Federal Circuit.
- Patent/Trade Secrets. In a jury trial, obtained a more than $10 million verdict for infringement of patents relating to a medical device and misappropriation of trade secrets.
- Patent. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, obtained affirmance of judgment of invalidity of seven asserted patents relating to advanced media delivery technologies.
- Patent. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, obtained affirmance of final written decision by the Patent Trials and Appeals Board cancelling 16 patent claims relating to electronic locks.
- Patent. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, obtained reversal of a district court’s grant of summary judgment and claim construction on patents relating to elevator systems.
- Patent. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, obtained reversal of a district court’s grant of summary judgment of noninfringement of a patent relating to a surgical device.
- Patent. On appeal to the Federal Circuit, obtained affirmance of final written decision by the Patent Trials and Appeals Board cancelling all asserted patent claims relating to self-supporting tents.
- Patent. After a jury trial, obtained a complete victory from the Federal Circuit, which held that all patents asserted against client’s medical diagnostic device were either invalid or not infringed.
- Patent. Obtained summary judgment from district court invalidating all patent claims asserted against our client’s commercial building framing component and obtained a ruling from the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment on appeal.
- Patent. Obtained summary judgment from trial court invalidating all patent claims asserted against client’s online gaming website and obtained affirmance of that judgment on appeal to the Federal Circuit.
- Patent. Obtained settlement for our client after winning all disputed claim terms in claim construction proceedings for patents covering personal mobility devices.
- Patent. Obtained settlement for client in electronic accessories industry shortly after filing suit.
- Patent/Trademark/Copyright. Obtained settlement for our client after winning all disputed claim terms in claim construction proceedings for patents covering school furniture.
- Patent/Design Patent. Obtained settlement for our client after winning all disputed claim terms in claim construction proceedings for patents covering eyewear.
- Trademark. Obtained settlement for our banking industry client in trademark infringement action after defeating summary judgment.
- Trademark. Obtained settlement for nutritional supplement client in trademark infringement action after defeating summary judgment.
- Design Patent/Trademark/Trade Dress. Obtained settlement for furniture manufacturer client after defeating summary judgment on trade dress claims.
- Trade Secrets. Obtained settlement after winning vigorously contested motions to compel and forcing defendant to produce incriminating documents in trade secret misappropriation case relating to automotive components.
- Trade Secrets. Obtained settlement for tool manufacturer in trade secrets case after discrediting plaintiff’s key third-party witness during deposition.
- Patent. Obtained summary judgment from district court invalidating all patent claims asserted against our client’s commercial building framing component and obtained a ruling from the Federal Circuit affirming the judgment on appeal.
- Patent. Obtained summary judgment from trial court invalidating all patent claims asserted against client’s online gaming website and obtained affirmance of that judgment on appeal to the Federal Circuit.
- Patent. Obtained settlement for our client after winning all disputed claim terms in claim construction proceedings for patents covering personal mobility devices.
This page includes cases litigated while our lawyers were practicing with their prior firms.